Save a copy for yourself. You'll need to edit the html to tailor the table dimensions for a specific context.
Saving the table downloads a new copy. (You'll probably want to rename it to the original; that bit is kinda janky.)
As I said before, just view source on this beauty! π
The problem: implementing text editor operations as lines might wrap or scroll.
e.g. clicking with the mouse to reposition the cursor, or pressing the down arrow (which might cause a scroll)
The key new solution: an API of primitives that make such operations fairly self-evident to build.
I think they might be applicable to any pixel-based editors that use proportional fonts. They seem independent of the data structure used by the editor. I use an array of lines, and so locations are defined as (line_index, pos) tuples, where pos counts in utf-8 code-points.
There's probably a few bugs but hopefully it'll stabilize quickly. I'd appreciate people trying it out.
Lessons from this experience:
I think I now better understand the "abyss".
The code in the screenshot is a function to convert a mouse click (mx, my) into the location (line_index, pos) of the character at that point on the screen.
The problem is much of this function is boilerplate shared with several other places, such as the code to draw text on screen, compute the height of a wrapped line, etc. The boilerplate makes it difficult to see the business logic unique to this particular function, and so creates pressure to prematurely create an abstraction to "DRY things out". Highlighting the shape of the boilerplate in pink helps the eye to focus on the unique business logic in the protrusions, and so counters the pressure to hide the boilerplate before I've figured out the best way to do so.
(As an aside, this is an example of what I think of as "programmer-configured highlighting". We've gotten used to our editors deciding what to highlight for us, and we just pick the colors. One little tool I use everyday is the ability to highlight specific identifiers which flips this around: I pick a word, and the editor picks a color at random to highlight it with. And the highlight persists across sessions. The color of the State variable in the screenshot was selected in this manner.)
Until now I've been developing the editor the "usual" way, which for me consists of needing some computation, figuring out the most convenient place to perform the computation, then squirreling away the result somewhere it's available when needed. In an effort to get myself out of the rut of the inevitable problems of indirection and cache invalidation that result, I've been trying to replace all my ad hoc data structures with on-demand computation based on the base state of the program. And what I've been ending up with is umpteen variations of this pictured algorithm, just with different code stuck on to the protrusions.
There may be an abstraction that comes out of all this, but I don't see it yet. And as CA says, a flower isn't made up of identical petals. Each one evolves uniquely as a part of the whole.
Here's the Lua code skeleton corresponding to that drawing. The ellipses correspond to protrusions in the drawing:
for line_index, line in array.each(State.lines, State.screen_top.line) do
if line.mode == 'text' then
local initpos = 1
if line_index == State.screen_top.line then
-- top screen line
initpos = State.screen_top.pos
end
for pos, char in utf8chars(line.data, initpos) do
if char:match('%s') then
if line_wrap_at_word_boundary(State) then
...
else
...
end
else
if x+w > State.right then
...
else
...
end
end
end
else -- drawing
...
end
end
…might represent a function for initializing a text editor widget with the following signature:
edit.initialize(top, left, right, bottom, font_size)
And the numbers indicate a specific call to this function:
edit.initialize(15, 15, 115, 215, 20)
Interestingly, these alternative semantics would make for a more pleasing glyph.
edit.initialize(margin-top, margin-left, margin-right, margin-bottom, font-size)
(Just a mockup to convey the idea. Plan is just to use this notation with pen and paper.)
Is this picture intelligible without any explanation?
Still several things left to investigate.
I want to delete some data structures and just recompute them all the time.
Adding z required rethinking the entire program. I tried to patch it in. Implications were not fully worked out.
I wonder if this is the major reason to huddle together on top of jenga stacks with tons of dependencies, terrified of fragmentation: You always need more testing than you think, and there's no way to compete with something that's been through that much testing.
I come stare at this abyss every year or two.
Doesn't do me any good, though.
(This post spawned a sprawling, constructive conversation.)
The following program lets you scrub the mouse downward to find more and more precise approximations of Ο within the red optical sight in the center of the screen.