Jul 15, 2007
Recent discoveries suggest that the adoption of agriculture, supposedly our most decisive step toward a better life, was in many ways a catastrophe from which we have never recovered. With agriculture came the gross social and sexual inequality, the disease and despotism, that curse our existence.

Hunter-gatherers enjoyed a varied diet, while early farmers obtained most of their food from one or a few starchy crops. The farmers gained cheap calories at the cost of poor nutrition.

Because of dependence on a limited number of crops, farmers ran the risk of starvation if one crop failed.

The mere fact that agriculture encouraged people to clump together in crowded societies, many of which then carried on trade with other crowded societies, led to the spread of parasites and infectious disease.

Besides malnutrition, starvation, and epidemic diseases, farming helped bring another curse upon humanity: deep class divisions. Only in a farming population could a healthy, non-producing Ă©lite set itself above the disease-ridden masses.

Farming may have encouraged inequality between the sexes, as well. Freed from the need to transport their babies during a nomadic existence, and under pressure to produce more hands to till the fields, farming women tended to have more frequent pregnancies than their hunter-gatherer counterparts–with consequent drains on their health.

Modern hunter-gatherers have at least as much free time as do farmers.

Bands of farmers outbred and then drove off or killed the bands that chose to remain hunter-gatherers, because a hundred malnourished farmers can still outfight one healthy hunter.

Jared Diamond on the prisoner’s dilemma presented by agriculture. via

Comments gratefully appreciated. Please send them to me by any method of your choice and I'll include them here.

archive
projects
writings
videos
subscribe
Mastodon
RSS (?)
twtxt (?)
Station (?)